Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41788152›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2026

Neurocognitive Processing of Facial Emotion Recognition in Individuals With Depression and Suicidal Ideation: An Eye-Tracking and EEG Study.

Qianlan Yin, Huijing Xu, Ying Zhu, Meng Liang, Qian Jiang, Bin Zhao, Taosheng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qianlan YinDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8621-5392
Huijing XuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4032-6948
Ying ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.
Meng LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.
Qian JiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.
Bin ZhaoThe 904th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Mental Health Center, 213003 Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Taosheng LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Psychology and Mental Health, Naval Medical University, 200000 Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8967-6928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide ideation (SI) is a critical concern, and understanding its neurocognitive underpinnings is essential for improved risk assessment. This study investigates altered neurocognitive processing during face recognition in individuals with depression and SI, utilizing a multimodal approach combining eye-tracking, electroencephalography (EEG), and deconvolution modeling. Methods: Eye-tracking and EEG data were recorded during face recognition tasks in individuals with depression, with and without SI. We analyzed visual attention patterns (fixation durations, saccadic velocities) and event-related potentials to emotional stimuli. Deconvolution analysis separated microsaccade-related activities (like regression-based event-related potential (rERP) and regression-based fixation-related potential (rFRP)). Results: Individuals with SI exhibited attentional biases toward emotional faces, characterized by shorter first fixation durations and faster saccadic velocities. Reduced rERP amplitudes in response to surprise and decreased rFRP amplitudes during sad conditions were also observed, suggesting altered neural responses. Integrating eye-tracking and EEG data (the area under the curve (AUC) = 0.771) improved the accuracy of detecting SI compared to eye-tracking alone (AUC = 0.643). Conclusions: These findings provide novel evidence for altered neurocognitive processing of emotional faces in individuals with depression and SI. The multimodal approach highlights the potential of combining eye-tracking and EEG measures as biomarkers for identifying individuals at risk. Future research should focus on larger, more diverse samples and longitudinal designs to validate these findings and translate them into clinical applications.

Indexed as

electroencephalographyeye-trackingmultimodal approachsuicide ideation

Identifiers

PMID41788152
PMCPMC12957983

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.