ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Geneticization outside genetics' birthplace: ethical, legal and social implications in the Gulf Cooperation Council region.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geneticization refers to the growing tendency to explain health, behavior, and identity primarily through genetic terms, often at the expense of social, environmental, and cultural factors. This paper offers a novel contribution to the global discourse on geneticization - a phenomenon extensively examined in Western, predominantly secular contexts, by critically analyzing its ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) within the Muslim-majority societies of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. As genetic screening programs such as prenatal, newborn, and premarital screening (PMS) gain traction across the GCC countries, often supported by advanced technologies like whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing, they encounter not only globally recognized concerns but also distinct religio-ethical and socio-cultural challenges that necessitate engagement with Islamic moral frameworks. Drawing on a close analysis of interdisciplinary literature, the study identifies key ethical tensions surrounding theological sensitivities, informed consent, individual autonomy, genetic discrimination, stigmatization, eugenics, and the management of incidental findings. The paper further highlights legal inconsistencies in PMS mandates and the evolving regulatory landscape governing genomic research across the region. Social implications including high rates of consanguinity, varying levels of public awareness, and community reception of screening programs underscore the need for culturally responsive approaches that align with local values and norms. By foregrounding these region-specific dynamics, this paper advances a more contextually grounded and ethically attuned understanding of geneticization beyond its Western foundations. In doing so, it offers new perspectives for navigating the ELSI of genomics in the GCC, with broader relevance to the Arab world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.