ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Machine learning strategies for predicting pediatric suicidal behaviors in a Brazilian emergency setting.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide, yet its prediction remains a challenge. This difficulty arises not only because suicidal behavior is a rare event in the general population, leading to significant class imbalance in datasets, but also due to its complex, multi-causal nature involving a non-linear interplay of sociodemographic and clinical factors. Furthermore, while the majority of suicides occur in middle-income countries, there is a lack of predictive models tailored to these specific social contexts. This study evaluates machine learning strategies in an enriched clinical setting: a pediatric psychiatric emergency center in Brazil. Methods: We analyzed a comprehensive database of 2,365 youth seeking emergency care. We benchmarked three machine learning algorithms, namely Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost, to predict three outcomes: self-harm, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. To address class imbalance, we applied oversampling techniques to the training data. We also used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to quantify each feature's contribution to the predictions. Findings and interpretation: In this setting, suicide-related behaviors represented 28.7% of the clinical demand. The Random Forest model combined with oversampling was the most effective strategy, achieving sensitivities of 78.04% for suicidal ideation, 71.18% for suicide attempts, and 69.37% for self-harm. Specificity remained consistently above 75%. SHAP value analysis revealed that social determinants were critical predictors, highlighting that social conditions in middle-income populations introduce unique variables that significantly influence suicidal risk. While accuracy for suicide attempts remained a challenge, SHAP provided clear clinical insights into the drivers of risk. Conclusions: Machine learning, specifically Random Forest models together with oversampling and SHAP, demonstrates strong potential for identifying suicidal risk in pediatric emergency settings. By integrating clinical data with social determinants, these models provide a transparent and scalable strategy for early identification in regions with limited specialized psychiatric resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.