ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The breakthroughs of caregivers in a parent-implemented intervention for children with neurodevelopmental disorders in Hong Kong, China: an exploratory qualitative study of change mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Parent-implemented intervention (PII) trains caregivers to be the interventionists to offer tailored learning opportunities at home and is used to promote the positive development of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Its effectiveness hinges not only on learning and implementing the strategies, but also on the beliefs, wellbeing and capacities of the caregivers. The existing literature focused on the acquisition and application of skills, yet little is known about the inner experiences and transformation of caregivers. This study explored their changing processes and focused especially on their breakthroughs. Methods: Twenty-two caregivers participated in five semi-structured focus groups in Hong Kong, China. They had all completed the localized version of the World Health Organization Caregiver Skills Training. Reflexive thematic analysis was adopted to analyze the qualitative data and construct codes and themes. Results: There were three major breakthroughs which caregivers experienced leading to positive outcomes for themselves and for their children. The first one was the acquisition of self-care practices that helped caregivers recognize their own physical and emotional exhaustion and cultivate capacities for childcare. The second was on environmental settings, in which the caregivers learnt to adjust the home setup to promote parent-child engagement and the building of play routines. The third was on developing the discernment of the window to intervene. Caregivers learnt to adjust their pace to align with their children's, follow into the children's world and cultivate empathy towards the young. Being able to discern when and how to create teaching opportunities allowed caregivers to be more relaxed, and children enjoyed interacting with their caregivers more. Conclusions: This study offers insights into the theory of change of PII by unveiling the transformation processes of caregivers and identified the key factors promoting positive outcomes. Through focusing on breakthroughs, it also sheds light on the inner struggles and rewards the parents experienced as the primary caregivers and interventionists. It invites clinical professionals to consider the wellbeing of caregivers as one of the key social determinants of the success of PIIs, and explore how self-care, environmental setup, and discernment to intervene shape immediate and long-term clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.