ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict comorbid hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is a critical comorbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that significantly increases cardiovascular risk. Although several predictive models have been developed using conventional logistic regression or basic machine learning algorithms, these approaches often face significant limitations. Many existing models suffer from a lack of external validation which limits their generalizability, or they operate as black boxes without providing interpretable clinical insights. Furthermore, most prior studies have focused exclusively on biological indicators while overlooking the potential impact of socioeconomic determinants and lifestyle factors on disease progression. Objective: To address these gaps, this study aimed to develop a high-performance Random Forest model for predicting hypertension risk in diabetic patients by integrating multidimensional data, including clinical metrics, lifestyle habits, and socioeconomic status. The study further sought to validate the model's robustness using an independent external cohort and assess its clinical utility through SHAP analysis, providing transparent interpretations of risk factors to guide personalized medical decision-making. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records from two tertiary hospitals. Eligible adults with type 2 diabetes and no prior hypertension were included. A total of 900 eligible patients were included, with 420, 180, and 300 participants in the training, testing, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Feature selection combined Boruta and LASSO methods, yielding seven predictors. Seven algorithms were tested, and model performance was assessed through cross-validation, independent testing, and external validation. The random forest model was explained using SHAP analysis. Results: Among 900 participants, the random forest model achieved the best discrimination, with AUCs of 0.89 in internal testing and 0.83 in external validation. Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed stability and clinical utility. Key predictors included alcohol consumption, triglycerides, diabetes duration, health insurance type, fasting blood glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and exercise frequency. Conclusion: The validated random forest model effectively predicts hypertension in type 2 diabetes patients, integrating metabolic, behavioral, and socioeconomic factors. Its interpretability and robust performance support its potential use for early identification and personalized prevention of hypertension in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.