ArticleNanoscale advances2026
Multi-scale computational insights into West Nile virus E-protein adsorption on graphene and phosphorene nanomaterials.
Article in Nanoscale advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MXene-Protein Corona Interfaces for Molecular Profiling of Alzheimer's Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing global impact of flaviviruses highlights the critical need for diagnostic platforms and antiviral therapeutic strategies. In this context, protein-nanomaterial interactions offer valuable opportunities for the rational design of devices with tailored properties. Here, we investigated the adsorption of the West Nile virus envelope protein, specifically domain III, onto two-dimensional nanomaterials, namely graphene and phosphorene, using an integrated multiscale computational approach combining Brownian dynamics docking and extensive molecular dynamics simulations. Docking and MD refinement revealed multiple stable binding orientations on both graphene and phosphorene. On graphene, adsorption is mainly driven by residues in the C-D loop and C-terminal region, involving both hydrophobic and charged interactions. In contrast, phosphorene exhibits more distributed binding, engaging the N-terminal and several loop regions through predominantly polar and hydrophobic contacts, reflecting distinct adsorption mechanisms for the two surfaces. Free energy decomposition confirmed that adsorption on both surfaces is thermodynamically favorable and primarily driven by van der Waals interactions, with phosphorene exhibiting higher stabilization energies. Structural analyses (radius of gyration, solvent-accessible surface area, and secondary structure content) indicate that graphene induces stronger but more disruptive binding, leading to a reduction in β-strand content, whereas phosphorene preserves the protein's native fold and hydrogen-bond network, minimizing structural perturbation. Comparison with experimental data supports these computational findings, suggesting that phosphorene achieves an optimal balance between adsorption strength and structural preservation. These atomistic insights provide a foundation for designing a sensitive and selective phosphorene-based biosensing platform for WNV detection and offer valuable guidance for designing phosphorene-inspired antiviral therapeutic strategies.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.