ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Cancer survival in Lower Silesia: insights from a national oncology network pilot in Poland.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study provides population-based data on biological subtypes of breast cancer (BC) and associated survival outcomes among Polish women diagnosed between 2019 and 2023 in the Lower Silesia region during the national pilot phase of the National Oncology Network (NON). Methods: Data on BC cases were obtained from the DCOPIH databases as the leader of the pilot program in Poland in between 2019 and 2023 also in the Lower Silesia region. The main outcome was overall cancer survival and cases were linked to existing mortality databases. All patient consent and scope of data analysis was provided based on the MoH Regulation. Analyses included stage at diagnosis, biological subtypes, and five-year survival, stratified by age, subtype, and stage. Results: A total of 4490 women with BC were included. The luminal B subtype was the most prevalent, generally increasing with age and peaking at 46% in the 80+ age group. Across all stages, five-year survival was highest for luminal A (Kaplan Meier estimation of 90.3%. 95% CI: 88.1%-92.5%) and lowest for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (Kaplan Meier estimation of 68.5%, 95% CI: 63.4%-74.0%). For stages I disease, five-year survival was 92.8% for all subtypes aggregated (95% CI: 91.1%-94.5%). Survival declined with advancing stage, particularly for TNBC cases, in population with TNBC diagnosed at stage IV no patient surviving above 48 months was observed. Conclusions: Distinct clinical trajectories of BC subtypes have significant implications for prognosis and healthcare resource allocation. The observation of ≥92% five-year survival for stage I disease across subtypes underscores the critical importance of early detection, particularly in biologically aggressive subtypes such as TNBC breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.