ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
A Novel Risk Score Based on Lipid-Related Biomarkers for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Multicenter Machine Learning Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop and test an explainable machine learning (ML) predictive model based on lipid-related biomarkers to predict acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 10,127 consecutive hospitalized patients at three large hospitals were retrospectively studied between 2022 and 2024. ACS incidence was recorded as the primary outcome. Eight ML models were used to calculate the risk of ACS during hospitalization and to distribute patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Results: All patients were randomly divided into a 70% training set (n = 7088) and a 30% test set (n = 3039). ACS occurred in 1119 (15.8%) and 461 (15.2%) patients, respectively. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) exhibited the best predictive performance (area under the curve, 0.829) for ACS in the training set. The final model, which included the top 10 features from the LightGBM model, including lipid-related markers and clinical features, achieved a C-index of 0.781 on the test set and demonstrated a significant ability to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Conclusion: We constructed a risk-stratification model based on lipid-related biomarkers derived from ML models to predict ACS in hospitalized patients, which could assist in identifying patients with high discriminatory capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.