ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Associations Between Controlling Nutritional Status and Allostatic Load With Heart Failure Across Different Depressive States: A Cross-Sectional Study Using NHANES 2005-2018 Data.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) and allostatic load (AL) indices indicate significant correlations with heart failure (HF). Given that depressive status associated with metabolic dysregulation may influence these associations, this research aimed to explore whether depressive status modulates the associations between these two indices and HF. Methods: Data were analyzed from 4632 participants aged ≥20 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2005-2018. After applying weighting (WTINT2YR) to the included data, samples with missing data and those without weighted processing were excluded. Binary logistic regression analysis was then employed to investigate the relationships between CONUT, AL, and HF. Subgroup analysis was performed with depressive status as a stratifying factor, and a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model was used to investigate the presence of linear or non-linear relationships between the two clinical indices and HF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of the different models for HF. Results: Both CONUT and AL were positively correlated with HF in Model 1 (CONUT: odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.63, Conclusions: The CONUT and AL indices demonstrated positive associations with HF in the general population. Depressive status is a moderating factor that attenuates the association between CONUT and HF. Meanwhile, CONUT and AL are not effective predictors of HF risk under conditions of depressive status. Therefore, screening for depressive status in individuals with high CONUT and AL indices is important for predicting HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.