ArticleBMJ public health2026
Being active in Ghana: facilitators, barriers and preferences for being physically active in community settings among Ghanaian adults.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Physical inactivity remains a major risk factor for the development of non-communicable diseases. This study investigated physical activity behaviours, as well as barriers, facilitators and preferences that influence participation in a range of community-based physical activity interventions among Ghanaian adults. Methods: Adults living in six regions of Ghana completed a cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited using a multi-stage sampling technique. Data were collected using a researcher-developed structured questionnaire, administered to participants using Kobo Toolbox, with data reported descriptively and analysed using binary logistic regression. Results: A total of 1122 out of 1164 participants completed the survey (mean age±SD=31.0±12.0; women=621). Overall, 648 (60.1%) participants engaged in ≥150 min of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)/week, while 375 (33.4%) participants completed muscle-strengthening exercises≥twice/week. About a quarter of respondents (n=301, 26.8%) were knowledgeable about the guidelines for physical activity. Six out of ten participants expressed that social media is an effective way to encourage regular physical activity among Ghanaian adults. Over half of the participants (n=624, 55.6%) reported they would take part in physical activity interventions if offered by their place of worship and about half (n=443, 45.6%) indicated they would attend gyms/fitness centres regularly if they were more accessible and affordable in Ghana. Being male (adjusted odds ratios (AOR) 1.92, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.50), having a basic level of education (AOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.63) and being knowledgeable about guidelines for physical activity (AOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.53) were associated with higher odds of engaging in ≥150 min of MVPA per week as per guidance. These findings suggest that social media and faith-based settings may be effective contexts for promoting physical activity in Ghana. Improving accessibility and affordability of gyms/fitness centres may also increase engagement in structured and unstructured physical activity. Conclusion: This study found that a large percentage of participants were not meeting the guidance for daily physical activity. Knowledge about the guidelines for physical activity was very low and concerning. Participants expressed a strong preference for physical activity interventions to be delivered through social media channels, by healthcare professionals and in places of worship. These findings highlight the importance of leveraging these settings for promoting physical activity in Ghana.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.