ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RNA language models (LMs) are increasingly applied to RNA structure and function analysis, yet their intrinsic representational capacities remain poorly characterized. Here, we present a standardized zero-shot evaluation of 21 RNA LMs, with representative DNA LMs included as reference controls. Three complementary tasks-attention-based RNA secondary structure prediction, embedding-based RNA classification, and mutational fitness estimation from sequence likelihoods-are evaluated without downstream fine-tuning. Our results reveal substantial variability across models and clear trade-offs between structural, functional, and evolutionary representations. RNA-specific, noncoding RNA-enriched pretraining is crucial for capturing structural information, while evolutionary signals from multiple sequence alignments substantially boost performance. Although model scaling yields gains, architectural and objective choices critically influence performance across task categories. Together, this study provides a foundational benchmark, highlights inherent challenges in learning unified RNA representations, and offers insights for developing next-generation RNA foundation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.