ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Partial pictures: what routine health data can and cannot tell us about the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement of contact coverage of maternal and newborn health services may overestimate the benefits of the care that is provided, because the quality of care is not captured. It is therefore important to better understand the opportunities and challenges of capturing elements of care quality in routine health information systems (RHIS). This study explored healthcare workers' (HCWs), health sector managers' and policymakers' perspectives on the value and limits of routine health data to understand the quality of maternal and neonatal health services in Tanzania. We conducted qualitative research during two periods to capture perspectives across facility, district, regional and national levels. In Mtwara region in 2023, we conducted ethnographic observations at two hospital labour wards and 29 in-depth interviews with healthcare workers, hospital leaders, and district/regional managers. In 2025, we carried out 17 additional interviews with regional managers in Mtwara and with key national-level stakeholders. Our findings demonstrate that Tanzania's RHIS provides a valuable but partial picture of quality of care for maternal and neonatal health services. Care processes-including both provision and experience of care-are captured only to a limited extent. Using boundary object theory, we highlight how the same health information must serve diverse stakeholder needs. While there are opportunities to integrate more quality-of-care indicators, standardized RHIS cannot be expected to comprehensively capture the multifaceted nature of care quality. For quality measurement to support meaningful local health service improvement, a flexible, bottom-up approach is essential. However, the current emphasis on top-down oversight acts as a barrier for local-level data use. Relevant and feasible measurement of the quality of facility-based care requires a fundamental shift in current RHIS priorities-from systems that extract data for those 'up there' to platforms that also create value for those who provide care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.