Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41789936›Full record

ArticleJournal of biochemistry2026

Quantification of L- and D-enantiomers of proline, trans-4-hydroxyproline and cis-4-hydroxyproline in natural samples using differential labelling with 12C- and 13C6-dabsyl chloride, chiral separation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Bhisma Rai, Tetsuo Ishida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bhisma RaiDepartment of Nutrition, Koshien University, 10-1 Momijigaoka, Takarazuka, Hyogo 665-0006, Japan.
Tetsuo IshidaDepartment of Nutrition, Koshien University, 10-1 Momijigaoka, Takarazuka, Hyogo 665-0006, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-5150-9433

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP18590528, JP25460684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

L-Proline (L-Pro) and trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline (t-4-HPL) are major components of collagen and plant cell wall proteins. During their breakdown, free L-Pro and t-4-HPL  are produced abundantly and play unique biological roles through complex metabolisms including isomerization. Therefore, it is essential to quantify all the six stereoisomers of proline and 4-hydroxyproline. Here, analytes were first labelled with  12C-dabsyl group, which has strong red colour and stability under light. Secondly, each of the  13C6-dabsyl stereoisomers were added to  12C-dabsylated samples as internal standards before cleanup. Finally, the molar ratio of  12C- and  13C6-dabsyl analytes was determined as the intensity ratio of doublet molecular ions with m/z difference of six in mass spectra, which were obtained by subjecting the cleaned sample to capillary chromatography-mass spectrometry. The total amounts of proline, t-4-HP and cis-4-hydroxyproline were determined using the standard addition method. Linear calibration curves (R2 > 0.99) were obtained in the range of 10-1000 pmol. To determine the molar ratio of D- and L-enantiomers, enantiopure dabsyl analyte fraction was obtained using reverse-phase and chiral chromatography. Mouse serum contained 0.20 μmol/L trans-4-hydroxy-D-proline. Achatina fulica haemolymph contained 0.070 μmol/L D-proline. The Santalum album wood powder contained all the 6 stereoisomers and unexpectedly the D-enantiomer was dominant for trans-4-hydroxyproline.

Indexed as

HydroxyprolineProlineAnimalsLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMiceStereoisomerismHydroxyprolineProlinechiral separationisotope dilutionmatrix effectssecondary amino acidsstandard addition

Identifiers

PMID41789936
PMCPMC13326756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.