Observational studyCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Integrative Molecular Analysis to Predict Clinical Benefit of Everolimus in Patients With Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs).
Observational study in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Genomic Patterns of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) Identify Sub-Sets for Rational Therapeutic Targeting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare and heterogeneous. Everolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), is widely used in gastrointestinal and pancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). Owing to the lack of validated biomarkers, exploratory analyses of molecular pathways may help identify subgroups that derive clinical benefit from everolimus.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients with GEP-NETs who received everolimus and underwent tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS). Genomic alterations were categorized into seven predefined signaling pathways (PI3K/AKT/mTOR, MAPK, DNA damage repair (DDR), developmental, epigenetic regulation, JAK-STAT, and cell-cycle regulation), and patients were classified as mutated (≥1 alteration) or wild-type. Clinical outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Associations between pathway alterations and outcomes were assessed.ResultsTwenty-eight patients were included. Median PFS was 26.4 months (95% CI, 17.3-37.1) and median OS was 41.0 months (95% CI, 36.6-not reached [NR]). Alterations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway were associated with more favorable treatment outcomes, including a higher ORR (47.6% vs. 14.3%; OR, 5.17; 95% CI, 0.49-275.05; p=0.191) and a significantly higher DCR (85.7% vs. 28.6%; OR, 13.0; 95% CI, 1.40-199.5; p=0.009). Survival outcomes also tended to be longer in this group compared with wild-type tumors, with median OS of 59.0 vs. 40.8 months (p=0.321) and median PFS of 26.4 vs. 18.6 months (p=0.858). In contrast, alterations in DDR-related genes were associated with lower ORR and DCR, while alterations in cell-cycle regulation pathways were associated with shorter OS and PFS and numerically lower response rates. No significant differences in survival or response outcomes were observed for MAPK, JAK-STAT, epigenetic, or developmental pathways.ConclusionsPathway-level genomic alterations were associated with differential clinical benefit from everolimus in GEP-NETs, with PI3K/AKT/mTOR alterations suggesting greater benefit, while DDR and cell-cycle alterations indicated reduced benefit. Despite the small cohort, these findings support the potential of pathway-based biomarkers and warrant prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.