ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Improving MRI-based differentiation of brain metastasis, glioblastoma, and primary CNS lymphoma using deep learning.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model based on conventional MRI for preoperative differentiation of brain metastasis (BM), glioblastoma (GBM), and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and to evaluate its diagnostic utility as a decision-support tool for radiologists.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 1,298 patients with histopathologically confirmed BM (n = 426), GBM (n = 456), or PCNSL (n = 416). A 2.5D ResNet50-based DL model was developed using axial T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. A clinical model (CM) incorporating demographic and semantic imaging features was constructed using multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was evaluated in independent internal and external test sets using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pairwise AUC comparisons were performed using the DeLong test. A reader study involving three radiologists with different experience levels compared diagnostic accuracy before and after DL assistance.
resultsThe DL model achieved AUCs of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.773–1.000) internally and 0.863 (95% CI: 0.862–0.864) externally. One-versus-rest AUCs were significantly higher than those of the CM for GBM and PCNSL in both datasets (all p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed for BM externally (p = 0.97). With DL assistance, mean radiologist accuracy increased from 69.8% to 81.4% internally and from 73.8% to 87.8% externally (all p < 0.05).
conclusionThe proposed DL model based on conventional MRI enables accurate differentiation of BM, GBM, and PCNSL and provides additive diagnostic benefit when integrated into radiological interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41790161What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.