Trial reportExperimental brain research2026
Neck proprioception and mobility improved after upper neck and spine treatment: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal dysfunction at the occipito-atlantal (C0-C1) joint complex in conjunction with other spinal regions induces maladaptive plasticity from processing altered neck sensory input, yielding poor head and neck proprioception. Past work found that the One-to-Zero (OTZ) system, which manipulated the C0-C1 joint prior to other regions of joint dysfunction, improves cervical kinesthesia likely by impacting the proprioceptors that are densely located around the C0-C1joint. The aim of the current study was to determine the impact of OTZ on cervical kinesthesia, as compared to no treatment. A pragmatic, parallel group RCT conducted at a private practice randomized 72 participants (ages 18 to 65), into treatment (T) (n = 36) or control (C) (n = 36) groups. T received OTZ treatment until initial symptoms improved by 80%. Neck ranges of motion (ROM), and cervical kinesthesia (head to neutral (HtoN) and head to target (HtoT) at 50 and 65% of maximum head rotation were measured with eyes closed at baseline and after T (two to six weeks) or C period (2 weeks). Three trials per side were performed for all head repositioning tests, with trial error used to calculate repositioning errors. Significant time by group interactions were found for the primary outcome measure of HtoT-50%: Absolute, constant and variable error improved to a greater extent for T. HtoN: Constant error on the right side improved for C, while variable error improved more for T on both right and left sides. Secondary outcomes- significant time by group interactions were found for: Range of motion (neck extension, lateral flexion, and rotation); Visual analog pain ratings and Neck disability which all improved more for T. Selective improvements in neck kinesthesia in association with improved mobility suggest that the OTZ system normalizes proprioceptive afferent feedback resulting in short-term improvements in neck proprioception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41790254What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.