ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Evolution of outcomes in autologous stem cell transplantation for hodgkin lymphoma over 2 decades at King Hussein cancer center.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains a cornerstone in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), especially where access to novel agents is limited. We evaluated trends in outcomes after auto-HCT at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC) over two decades. We retrospectively analyzed adult HL patients who underwent auto-HCT between 2003 and 2020, divided into two eras: group A (2003-2015) and group B (2016-2020). Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared by log-rank; prognostic factors were assessed with Cox regression. We identified 265 patients (group A: N = 149, 56%; group B: N = 116, 44%). The median age at transplant was 30.2 years (range 18.7-64). 109 (43%) had primary refractory disease.) With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 0.1-233.7), the 5-year OS and PFS were 64.4% and 46.7%, respectively. Compared to group A, patients in group B were more likely to receive ≥ 1 salvage regimen (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.027), receive GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin) (48% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), receive TEAM (thiotepa, etoposide, ara-C, melphalan) conditioning (20% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001), and receive pembrolizumab at relapse (23% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001), they were less likely to relapse post auto-HCT (35% vs. 55%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis identified younger age, CR at transplant, later transplant era, and longer remission duration after frontline therapy as independent predictors of improved survival (p = 0.01). Auto-HCT outcomes for HL at KHCC have improved significantly in the modern era. This reflects advances in salvage regimens, supportive care, reduced non-relapse mortality, and integration of immunotherapy for post-autoHCT relapses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.