Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41790295›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2026

Liquid-liquid phase separation in neural development.

Sara Surini, Ivan de Curtis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara SuriniDivision of Neuroscience, Cell Adhesion Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ivan de CurtisDivision of Neuroscience, Cell Adhesion Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. decurtis.ivan@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7651-1515

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG 2023 ID 29097Fondazione Telethon-CARIPLO GJC22031Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca grant 2022EMZJL4Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a physicochemical process in which a homogeneous mixture of molecules separates into a denser phase originating from preferential self-assembly, driven by multivalent interactions, frequently mediated by intrinsically disordered protein regions, RNAs, or structured modular domains. LLPS produces a large variety of nuclear or cytoplasmic membrane-less biomolecular condensates with liquid-like properties. The importance of LLPS in several aspects of neural development and function is now supported by numerous studies. In this review we describe the findings supporting the importance of LLPS in different aspects of neural development, including asymmetric division of neural progenitors, chromatin remodeling and transcriptional/post-transcriptional control, localized translation and regeneration of neurites, and synaptic organization and function. We will focus especially on studies supporting the implication of LLPS in vivo. Finally, we will consider the important implication of LLPS-driven mechanisms as causes of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAnimalsBiomolecular CondensatesChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsNeural Stem CellsNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurodevelopmentPhase SeparationIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsAsymmetric cell divisionLocal translationNeural diseaseResponse to stressSynaptic organizationTranscriptional/post-transcriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID41790295
PMCPMC13003059

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.