ArticleACS nano2026
Direct Measurement of Protein Pair Interaction Potential.
Article in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A direct and unambiguous method for obtaining the pair interaction potential (PIP) of proteins does not currently exist. All existing approaches require solving an inverse problem, which always allows for alternative solutions. Here, we report a straightforward method for obtaining the PIP directly from experimentally determined three-dimensional spatial distributions of proteins. The approach is based on improvements to a recently developed method for determining the potential of mean force for nanoparticles using cryogenic electron tomography (cryo-ET). For the protein PIP, we find good agreement between the structure factor computed from cryo-ET positions and that obtained from small-angle X-ray scattering of protein solutions. We apply a novel subvolume method to compute Kirkwood-Buff integrals and show that the second virial coefficients calculated from the cryo-ET tomograms closely match those obtained experimentally from analytical ultracentrifugation. Both results validate our approach for deriving the PIP and indicate that the vitrified state matches the solution state. The generality of our validated approach is demonstrated for several small proteins with different structures and molecular weights, and under various experimental conditions, including changes in salt concentration, temperature, and pH. Our method does not require assumptions about protein shape or the analytical form of the interaction potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.