ArticleMedicine2026
Association between waist-to-height ratio and chronic pain among American adults: A cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic pain and obesity are prevalent conditions that substantially impair the quality of life and impose considerable socioeconomic burdens. We sought to investigate the relationship between the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and chronic pain in American adults. This cross-sectional analysis included adults who participated in the 1999 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Chronic pain referred to self-reported pain persisting for at least 3 months within the past year. The WHtR was derived by dividing the waist circumference in centimeters by the height in centimeters. Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline models were used to elucidate the relationship. Subgroup analyses were further used to assess the influence of potential confounding factors. A total of 11,591 adults were included, of whom 1690 (15.9%) had chronic pain. After full adjustment for potential confounders, a higher WHtR was significantly associated with an increased odd of chronic pain (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.50-6.65, P = .004). Participants in the highest WHtR quintile (Q5) were more likely to experience chronic pain than those in the lowest quintile (Q1) (adjusted OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.47-2.08, P = .011). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a nonlinear association with an inflection point at approximately 0.53. No significant interactions were observed across the subgroups (all P for interaction > 0.05). WHtR, as a simple and reliable anthropometric measure of central obesity, was positively associated with the risk of chronic pain among U.S. adults. These findings highlight the importance of controlling central obesity in chronic pain prevention and public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.