ArticleMedicine2026
Development and validation of a concussion risk prediction model using 2023 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concussions are complex, as patients often present with nonspecific symptoms, requiring timely evaluation and accurate diagnosis. This study, using the National Health Interview Survey database, aimed to explore and validate a concussion risk model to support diagnostic decision-making and patient treatment supervision. This study included demographic and clinical data of 14,275 subjects in 2023. Predictive indicators were selected using least baseline characteristics and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis, and a risk nomogram model was constructed. The model was evaluated using calibration curves, the area under curve of receiver operating characteristic, and decision curve analysis. The eligible concussion group (n = 363) and the nonconcussion group (n = 13,912) from the National Health Interview Survey database exhibited significant differences in 9 baseline characteristics (P <.05). Age, education level, general health, family income-to-poverty ratio, marital status, mental health, anxiety, behavior, and industry were found to be predictive indicators for patients with concussion. The model built using these predictive indicators demonstrated an area under curve of 0.712 in the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% CI: 0.68647 - 0.73671), indicating good predictive performance. The nomogram showed a strong association between the predicted and actual risks, with high calibration. Decision curve analysis confirmed strong discriminative ability of the model. The exploratory model based on 9 predictive indicators served as a valuable decision-making tool for clinicians. In concussion patients, these predictive indicators could be closely monitored in clinical practice, allowing for timely intervention to improve prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.