ArticleMedicine2026
Mendelian randomization study finds no causal link between inflammatory bowel disease and cirrhosis.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While some observational research has pointed to a connection between inflammatory bowel disease and increased cirrhosis risk, it has been difficult to determine if this is a genuine cause-and-effect relationship. The challenge lies in separating actual causation from confounding factors that might influence both conditions. In this study, we turned to Mendelian randomization (MR) - a method that uses genetic variations as natural experiments - to investigate whether inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) truly causes cirrhosis. We performed a two-sample MR analysis. Genetic instruments for IBD were obtained from the IBD Genetics Consortium. Cirrhosis outcome data were sourced from both the FinnGen consortium and the UK Biobank, with summary statistics combined via fixed-effects meta-analysis. Methods included inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger, weighted median, and sensitivity analyses (including Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, and leave-one-out analysis). The evidence from our MR analysis does not support a causal effect of IBD on cirrhosis risk. Our main analysis using inverse-variance weighted showed an odds ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval = 0.97-1.07, P = .42), indicating no significant association. Other methods told the same story, and our sensitivity analyses revealed no concerning heterogeneity or pleiotropy that might undermine these results. Put simply, our findings suggest that IBD does not directly cause cirrhosis. The associations seen in previous observational studies were likely driven by other factors that affect both conditions, rather than a direct biological pathway from IBD to liver damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.