Evidence mapPaperPMID 41790777Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Unraveling the therapeutic potential of Elaeagnus angustifolia extract on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): An investigation using zebrafish model.

Haya Abuhijleh, Zain Zakria, Hiba Bawadi, Ayat Hammad, Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa, Abdullah Shaito, Maha Al-Asmakh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haya AbuhijlehDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6643-3655
Zain ZakriaVice President for Medical and Health Sciences Office, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-8367
Hiba BawadiDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ayat HammadDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ala-Eddin Al MoustafaOncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abdullah ShaitoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-7962
Maha Al-AsmakhDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7855-4001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a widespread and aggressive disease, with 2.3 million new cases globally in 2022. Metastasis, the spread of cancer cells to distant organs, remains a leading cause of breast cancer-related mortality. Current treatment options, particularly traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, are often associated with severe side effects, emphasizing the urgent need for safer and more effective therapeutic alternatives. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents one of the most aggressive breast cancer subtypes, characterized by the absence of estrogen receptors (ER), receptors (PR), and HER2 expression. The human TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231, was selected in this study due to its aggressive, metastatic phenotype and its well-established use in zebrafish xenograft models. This makes it a highly relevant platform for preliminary in vivo evaluation of novel plant-derived compounds, particularly those targeting hard-to-treat breast cancer subtypes such as TNBC. Elaeagnus angustifolia (EA), commonly known as Russian olive, has attracted interest for its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. However, its potential anticancer activity, especially against TNBC, remains relatively unexplored. This research investigated the efficacy of EA extract against MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells using a wild-type AB zebrafish model. A key objective was to evaluate the toxicological profile of EA across multiple physiological parameters in zebrafish, including developmental, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, and hepatic functions. The study identified safe, non-toxic concentrations of EA extract (0.5 mg/mL and 0.75 mg/mL). Moreover, treatment with EA in zebrafish xenografts led to a dose-dependent reduction in fluorescence intensity of injected TNBC cells, suggesting suppression of tumor cell proliferation and survival.. These findings suggest that EA warrant further investigation as a potential anticancer agent for TNBC. The observed safety profile and preliminary anti-tumor effects in zebrafish provide a foundation for future mechanistic and mammalian studies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicElaeagnaceaePlant ExtractsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMDA-MB-231 CellsPhytotherapyToxicity TestsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysZebrafishAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID41790777
PMCPMC12965599

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.