ArticlePloS one2026
An assessment of sensory sensitivity, including certain anhedonia dimensions, in patients with schizophrenia using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses a largely unexplored area in schizophrenia: the relationship between affective functioning and sensory perception assessed through objective, quantifiable methods. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to assess the electrical sensory threshold in individuals with schizophrenia using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). It was hypothesized that patients with schizophrenia require higher current intensity to reach the sensory threshold and that an association exists between anhedonia and the subjective evaluation of the electrical stimulus. The study was based on an objective assessment of the sensory threshold using electrical stimulation. A gradually increasing electrical pulse was applied until the sensory threshold, defined as the minimum tingling sensation perceived by the participant, was reached. The study included 108 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia and 59 participants in the control group. Various dimensions of anhedonia were assessed using the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS). Quality of life and its domains were assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF. Participants reporting higher levels of sensory anhedonia rated the electrical stimulus as less pleasant. A negative correlation was observed between the pleasantness of the stimulus and both patient age and treatment duration. Furthermore, individuals whose clinical improvement was rated by the physician as more pronounced than at baseline exhibited greater sensitivity to the electrical stimulus. These findings suggest that anhedonia should be considered not only as a core symptom of schizophrenia, but also as a factor influencing patients' adaptation in multiple domains, including sensory processing. Addressing anhedonia may therefore be a relevant target for both preventive strategies and rehabilitation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.