ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Psychological distress and its associated factors among cancer patients in Nepal: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "I felt as though my life had come to an end": lived experiences of adolescents and young adults with cancer in Nepal.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological distress, encompassing depression, anxiety, and stress, is common among individuals with cancer but remains inadequately recognized in many low- and middle-income countries, including Nepal. Despite growing emphasis on holistic cancer care, psychological aspects are often overshadowed by clinical and financial concerns. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress among cancer patients in Nepal and to identify its associated sociodemographic, clinical, and economic factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer patients in two tertiary level referral hospitals in Nepal. The validated Nepali version of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS‑21) was used to assess psychological distress. A total of 262 participants were enrolled. SPSS version 27 was used to perform cleaning, coding and analyses. Associations were examined using binary logistic regression, and adjusted odds ratios were estimated using multivariate logistic regression, with p-values <0.05 considered statistically significant. More than two-thirds of cancer patients had depression (66.8%) and anxiety (68.7%) symptoms, and nearly three-fifths had symptoms of stress (58.0%). Higher odds of psychological distress were observed among participants who were older, unemployed, had fewer years of education, and had advanced-stage cancer. Compared with patients diagnosed at stage I, those diagnosed at II, III, and IV had significantly higher odds of depressive symptoms, with crude odds ratios of 2.75 (95% CI: 1.39-5.42), 2.81 (95% CI: 1.40-5.64), and 4.21 (95% CI: 1.39-12.76), respectively. Although households of cancer patients experienced out of pocket expense, catastrophic health expense and impoverishment, no significant association was found between these indicators and psychological distress. Psychological distress is highly prevalent among Nepali cancer patients and is linked primarily to sociodemographic and clinical factors rather than direct economic burden. Integrating routine mental health screening and basic counseling into oncology services is urgently needed to improve patients' overall well-being.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.