ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
TOP1 and TOP2 complementarily maintain DNA replication fork progression in vertebrates.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During DNA replication, the topoisomerases TOP1 and TOP2 resolve topological stress associated with DNA unwinding. Based on their catalytic activities, TOP1 is believed to relieve positive supercoil ahead of the replication fork, whereas TOP2 primarily removes topological intertwines between sister chromatids behind the replication fork. As the replication fork rotates, these two TOPs are considered to function complementarily. While this functional interplay between TOP1 and TOP2 has been well established in yeast, it remains unclear whether a similar genetic interaction exists in vertebrate cells. To investigate this, we generated conditionally TOP1-depleted chicken DT40 cells, a model system amenable to gene editing. Although TOP1 is essential in DT40 cells, its depletion did not affect the replication fork progression. Similarly, treatment with ICRF193, a TOP2 inhibitor, had no impact on DNA replication rates. However, the combination of TOP1 depletion and ICRF193 treatment nearly abolished DNA replication, leading to S-phase arrest and rapid apoptosis. Interestingly, treatment of TOP1-depleted cells with etoposide, a TOP2 poison that inhibits DNA religation, did not affect the replication fork progression but instead caused cell cycle arrest in the G1/early S phase, suggesting an impaired initiation of DNA replication. These findings demonstrate that TOP1 and TOP2 have complementary roles in both the progression and initiation of DNA replication in vertebrate cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.