ArticleBMJ open2026
Integrating care in a children's hospital: a qualitative interview study with mental and physical health professionals in England.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore physical and mental health professionals' hopes and concerns around integrating their services in a colocated children's hospital.
methodsOne-off semi-structured interviews were conducted with 31 participants (16 mental health and 15 physical health professionals). Participants were purposively sampled to ensure representation across each trust and professional background. Participants included allied health professionals, nurses, team managers, paediatricians, psychiatrists and psychologists.
resultsStaff described integration as both promising and ambiguous. While many welcomed the potential for improved collaboration and holistic care, others expressed uncertainty about what integration would entail. Six key themes were identified: (a) siloed and patchy beginnings, (b) one whole child, (c) day-to-day of colocation, (d) the integrated worker, (e) patients not in the same boat and (f) extending integration.
conclusionsThis novel analysis offers insights around the practical and emotional processes involved in integrating care systems. Staff valued the potential for holistic, child-centred care, improved collaboration and shared learning but expressed concerns around ambiguity, shifting professional identities and the practicalities of colocating services. These tensions underscore the need for clearer communication, relationship-building and support structures during service redesign. Our findings also support integrating wider community and social care systems and call for future research involving young people's perspectives to ensure meaningful, inclusive integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.