ArticleBMC oral health2026
Association between temporomandibular disorders and sleep quality among undergraduate dental students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporomandibular disorders (TMD) are common among undergraduate dental students and have been associated with sleep disturbances. Dental students may be particularly vulnerable due to the academic and clinical demands of their education. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TMD-related clinical signs and sleep quality among undergraduate dental students.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 210 undergraduate dental students classified as TMD-positive (≥ 1 clinical sign: TMJ pain, clicking, or functional limitation, n = 115) or TMD-negative (no clinical signs, n = 95). Students with a history of temporomandibular joint treatment, current orthodontic treatment, diagnosed psychiatric disorders, chronic systemic diseases, or regular use of medications affecting sleep were excluded. TMD status was determined based on clinical findings, including joint pain, clicking, and functional limitation. Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Total PSQI scores were analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables (cut-off > 5). Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and Chi-Square/Fisher's Exact tests and associations with poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) were examined using modified Poisson regression with robust standard errors to estimate aPRs (95% CIs) including a TMD×sex interaction (two-sided α = 0.05).
resultsPoor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) was more frequent among students with TMD than those without TMD (100% and 93.68%, respectively; p = 0.008) and in females than in males (100% and 92.86%, respectively; p = 0.004). PSQI scores increased across academic years and proportion of students classified as poor sleepers differed by year (p = 0.0008). In modified Poisson regression adjusted for sex, academic year and age, TMD was independently associated with poor sleep (aPR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.006-1.075; p = 0.019). A significant TMD×sex interaction indicated effect modification by sex; the association was evident among males (male-stratified aPR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21; p = 0.015), while estimation within females was not feasible due to universal poor sleep.
conclusionsTMD-related clinical signs were associated with poorer sleep quality among dental students. These findings indicated that sleep disturbances and TMD-related symptoms frequently co-occur in this population. Given the cross-sectional design, causal inferences cannot be drawn, and longitudinal studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.