Evidence mapPaperPMID 41792809Full record

ArticlePlant methods2026

A high-throughput fluorescence-based microplate reader assay to quantify total flavonol levels in plant tissues.

Hana Daryanavard, Joëlle K Muhlemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hana DaryanavardDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium.
Joëlle K MuhlemannDepartment of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3001, Belgium. joelle.muhlemann@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlavonols are plant specialized metabolites that regulate plant growth, development, and stress responses. Due to their antioxidant activity, they also confer nutritional benefits to human health. Quantification of flavonols in plant tissues typically relies on chromatographic methods such as HPLC or LC-MS, or on microscopy-based approaches using diphenylboric acid 2-aminoethyl ester (DPBA) staining to visualize flavonols in plant tissues. These methods are time-consuming and resource intensive. Here, we present a rapid, high-throughput, fluorescence-based microplate reader assay for flavonol quantification, in which the flavonol-specific dye DPBA is added to plant extracts to form fluorescent complexes.

resultsThe assay was optimized for extraction efficiency and validated for sensitivity, accuracy, and reproducibility. It also shows consistency with HPLC measurements. We demonstrate its utility by quantifying flavonol levels in different tomato tissues, across different cultivars, and even between plant species. Our assay showed that reproductive tissue in tomato plants has higher flavonol levels than vegetative tissue. Also, we found variation in flavonol levels in tomato fruit skin across different laboratory and commercial cultivars, suggesting that our approach shows promise for use in genome-wide association studies to identify genetic factors underlying variation in flavonol levels. Lastly, we measured flavonol levels in dry leaves of different plants used for brewed beverages.

conclusionIn conclusion, the assay represents a simple, robust, and scalable flavonol screening tool for studies in plant metabolism, environmental physiology, breeding, and metabolic engineering.

Indexed as

Diphenylboric acid 2-aminoethyl esterFlavonolsFluorescence microplate readerHigh-performance liquid chromatographyHigh-throughput screening

Identifiers

PMID41792809
PMCPMC13081301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.