Trial reportScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Differential Effects of Twice vs. Four Times Weekly Combined Exercise Training in Aging Adults With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04218903 (Comparison of Different Weekly Frequencies of Combined Training on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Individuals With Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Different Weekly Frequencies of Combined Training on Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Individuals With Hypertension: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of combined exercise training with or without nutritional counseling on cardiovascular risk factors in older adults with hypertension: a pragmatic randomized trial.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current exercise guidelines emphasize a total weekly volume of exercise (i.e., 150 min/week), but the optimal weekly frequency remains uncertain. Therefore, this randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of combined resistance and aerobic training either two or four times per week, at the same total weekly volume, on office and ambulatory blood pressure in older adults with hypertension. Participants were randomized to exercise training performed either twice per week (CT2, n = 49) or four times per week (CT4, n = 49), for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was 24-h ambulatory BP; secondary outcomes included office BP and physical fitness, assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Of the 98 randomized participants (66% women; mean age 64 ± 7 years), all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, whereas 63 were retained for the per-protocol analysis after excluding those with low adherence (< 80%) or missing post-intervention data. Although no significant differences between groups were observed in office and ambulatory BP in the intention-to-treat analysis, office systolic (-8 mmHg, p = 0.001) and diastolic BP (-3 mmHg, p = 0.001) reduced in CT4 (-8 mmHg, p = 0.001), and systolic BP decreased in CT2 after training (-4 mmHg, p = 0.032). In the per-protocol analysis, office systolic BP was lower in CT4 than CT2 after training (-6 mmHg, p = 0.049). CT4 demonstrated significant reductions in 24-h systolic (-4 mmHg, p = 0.012) and diastolic BP (-2 mmHg, p = 0.010) after training. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved in CT4 (Δ = 8%, p < 0.001) but not in CT2. Our findings suggest that higher weekly frequency may optimize blood pressure management in hypertension, although these additional benefits appear to be dependent on high protocol adherence. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04218903.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.