ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
Proteogenomic characterization delineates clinically relevant subtypes of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is characterized by limited therapeutic options and unfavorable prognosis. To address this, we conduct proteogenomic analysis of 113 advanced DTCs, identifying three molecularly distinct subtypes: canonical, stromal, and immunogenic. These subtypes exhibit differences in driver mutations, histopathological features, and clinical outcomes. Based on their unique biology, we suggest distinct therapeutic strategies for each subtype. To facilitate clinical application, we develop a machine learning classifier that accurately predicts these subtypes using routinely available gene mutation and digital pathology data. The biological relevance of this classification is further confirmed in an independent cohort analyzed by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Moreover, analysis of a real-world cohort of patients receiving various systemic therapies provides preliminary clinical evidence supporting the potential utility of this subtyping framework for informing treatment decisions. Collectively, this study provides a rationale and a practical tool for future exploration of personalized treatment in advanced DTC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.