ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026
See, Touch, Feel, and Express: Achieving Safe and Natural Outcomes With HA Fillers-An International Consensus.
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidence and Characteristics of Delayed Inflammatory Reactions Secondary to Hyaluronic Acid Filler Injections: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of "natural outcomes" in filler treatments has been explored in clinical studies and literature, yet remains loosely defined, subjective, and lacks standardized assessment criteria.
aimsTo propose a multidimensional Natural Outcomes Framework to systematically define, assess, and communicate natural outcomes following hyaluronic acid (HA) filler treatment, facilitating attainment of desired results.
methodsAn international aesthetic multidisciplinary panel developed consensus statements and a practical framework for achieving safe and natural outcomes with HA fillers based on insights from a literature review, survey, and expert meeting.
resultsThis expert consensus emphasizes safety as a foundational aspect of natural outcomes. The framework extends beyond visual outcomes ("See") to encompass tactile ("Touch"), experiential ("Feel") and expressive ("Express") dimensions of naturalness, which can be assessed by various methods. The panel identified three categories of factors affecting natural outcomes: product, patient, and injector factors. Treatment can be optimized by selecting HA fillers with biomimetic design, suitable rheological properties, and low inflammatory potential; ensuring knowledge and technical competency; individualizing treatment plans; and fostering effective communication. A practical clinical workflow was devised to guide the attainment and assessment of safe and natural outcomes from pre-treatment to follow-up.
conclusionsThe Natural Outcomes Framework offers a structured approach to achieving safe and desired outcomes with HA fillers, aligned with this principle: "treat the patient, not the photograph." It promotes patient-practitioner alignment on treatment goals and use of appropriate products based on biomimetic design principles, contributing to the attainment of predictable and satisfying results with aesthetic HA filler treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.