Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41794823›Full record

ReviewTranslational psychiatry2026

Neural predictors of treatment outcome through emotion regulation in internalizing disorders: a narrative review.

Heide Klumpp, Delaney Davey, Scott A Langenecker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heide KlumppDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. hklumpp@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2652-7479
Delaney DaveyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4784-8925
Scott A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internalizing disorders such as depressive and anxiety disorders are prevalent, disabling, and characterized by difficulty managing emotions particularly in the context of negative information. Despite the availability of empirically supported treatments, response to these treatments remains heterogeneous. Accruing data indicate neural predictors of treatment response have the potential to contribute to precision medicine to improve treatment outcomes. This review evaluates functional magnetic resonance imaging studies that examined explicit (e.g., effortful) and implicit (e.g., automatic) emotion regulation involving negative stimuli and treatment response. Results showed treatments mostly consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure therapy, and/or pharmacotherapy. Explicit regulation findings were predominantly based on cognitive reappraisal, which showed pre-treatment activity in medial and lateral prefrontal cortices frequently served as predictors of treatment response. Regarding directionality, greater symptom improvement was generally associated with lower baseline activity in these regions. Results suggest patients with less baseline explicit regulation capacity may benefit more from treatment. For implicit regulation, most studies utilized emotional interference tasks. Predictors frequently involved prefrontal cortical regions and anterior cingulate cortex; here, the direction was largely that of more baseline activity predicting greater symptom improvement. Findings suggest treatment may leverage greater pre-existing implicit regulatory capacity. While baseline activity in other regions during explicit and implicit regulation were reported, including regions central to emotion processing (e.g., amygdala), results were less consistent. Despite these insights, substantial gaps in the literature were observed. For explicit regulation, studies predominantly focused on cognitive reappraisal, an adaptive regulation approach. Furthermore, the majority of studies consisted of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, and posttraumatic stress disorder with insufficient representation of other internalizing disorders. Findings underscore the relevance of neural predictors of treatment outcome through emotion regulation in internalizing disorders. However, further study is needed to determine their contribution in precision medicine.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderEmotional RegulationCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41794823
PMCPMC13003107

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.