ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-enabled RF data synthesis for breast ultrasound: efficacy in quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods can derive insightful biomarkers from raw radiofrequency (RF) signals for tissue characterization and monitoring, but their clinical adoption is limited by the inaccessibility and storage burden of RF data. This study is the first to investigate the potential of deep generative models in synthesizing RF data from standard B-mode images and evaluate their efficacy in downstream QUS analysis. Three conditional generative adversarial networks (cGAN), namely Pix2Pix, a shallow ViT‐based cGAN, and a deep ViT‐based cGAN, were adapted and trained on a large paired dataset of RF/B‐mode frames (21,174 training, 3,456 validation, 8,919 test frames) collected from 152 patients (98 patients in the training, 16 in validation, and 38 in the test set) with suspicious breast lesions. The synthesized RF data were assessed using sample-level evaluation metrics, and via a benign-malignant lesion classification task based on the corresponding QUS features. The generative models achieved a structural similarity index measure (SSIM) of 0.82 ± 0.05 on the synthetic RF data and an average peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of about 33 dB on the corresponding B-mode images, confirming strong reconstruction fidelity. In the lesion classification experiments, a classifier trained on a selected subset of six QUS features derived from the original RF data achieved a test accuracy of 82 ± 6%. In training and testing the classifier with the same subset of QUS features derived from the synthetic RF data, the deep ViT cGAN matched the original model’s performance (accuracy = 82 ± 6%), outperforming the Pix2Pix and shallow ViT cGANs. When the feature selection and classifier training and testing were exclusively performed on the synthetic QUS parameters, the Deep ViT cGAN (accuracy = 81 ± 7%) and Pix2Pix cGAN (accuracy = 81 ± 6%) demonstrated competitive performance, while the Shallow ViT remained slightly lower (accuracy = 79 ± 6%). The promising results obtained in this study demonstrate the feasibility of RF data synthesis from B‐mode images, and therefore, is a step forward towards QUS‐based tissue characterization without the necessity of direct access to RF data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.