ArticleDiabetologia2026
Development and validation of a trans-ancestry polygenic risk score for type 1 diabetes.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and application of type 1 diabetes polygenic scores across diverse populations.Diabetologia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe high heritability of type 1 diabetes has enabled the development of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as disease risk screening tools. PRSs can identify individuals at the highest genetic risk in a population, who can benefit from autoantibody and metabolic surveillance, to avoid ketoacidosis at diagnosis and to access preventive therapies. However, PRSs for type 1 diabetes developed from European data perform less well in non-European ancestries. We aimed to develop a PRS with comparable performance among different ancestries.
methodsUsing the PRS-CSx method, and data from large European, East Asian, African American and Hispanic type 1 diabetes genome-wide association studies (N
resultsIn the multi-ancestry Montreal-based cohort, TA-PS showed an AUROC of 0.89 which was significantly higher than the respective measure obtained with GRS2x in the same population (AUROC of 0.85). We obtained better overall sensitivity at the 90th percentile cut-off using TA-PS (0.71 in Europeans, 0.77 in South Asians), compared with sensitivity of 0.32 in African Americans and 0.56 in Europeans using GRS2x. The specificity obtained using TA-PS was slightly lower than that of GRS2x, albeit still acceptable (≥0.83 across all ancestries). These results were validated in the four independent cohorts. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationWe developed a trans-ancestry PRS that outperformed the European-based GRS2x. Importantly, TA-PS provides a comparable prediction in various ancestries, which supports its use in population-wide screening programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.