ReviewJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Clinical Applications of Electrical Conductivity Imaging Using MRI.
Review in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a noninvasive technique for probing the electrical properties of biological tissues: electrical conductivity and relative permittivity. This review focuses on the electrical conductivity and provides a comprehensive overview of applications across both low- and high-frequency regimes. At low frequencies (below 1 MHz), conductivity mapping primarily reflects tissue microstructure and ionic composition. In contrast, at high frequencies (around 100 MHz), tissue conductivity primarily reflects ionic composition. First, we summarize the theoretical foundations, technical developments, and reconstruction algorithms that underpin conductivity imaging, highlighting advances in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography, current density imaging, and electrical properties tomography. The main part of the article discusses preclinical and clinical applications, demonstrating the potential and possible roles of conductivity imaging in clinical settings, along with current challenges and emerging applications. Finally, we outline future directions toward integrating conductivity imaging into routine MRI protocols, with the potential to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic monitoring. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.