ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overestimating zero-shot fitness prediction: Broad benchmarks mask local failures and practical limitations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Simulations of the SARS-CoV-2 Fitness Landscape from Deep Mutational Scanning Experiments.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Supervised learning of protein variant effects across large-scale mutagenesis datasets.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing availability of data from multiplexed assays of variant effects (MAVEs) enables supervised model training against large quantities of experimental data to learn sequence-function relationships. Variant effect scores from MAVEs can, however, be influenced by the experimental method and library composition, resulting in experiment-to-experiment differences in the mapping from molecular level variant effects to MAVE readout. This variation presents a challenge for supervised learning across datasets that limits our ability to leverage the data generated by MAVEs. We here develop a framework for performing supervised learning with MAVE data that takes the influence of the experimental protocol into account, thus enabling variant effects to be learned across datasets produced in independent experiments. We apply the framework to train a model against variant effect scores collected with VAMP-seq, a MAVE technique that quantifies the steady-state cellular abundance of protein variants. Our results suggest that mapping variant abundance to VAMP-seq readout in a dataset-specific manner during model training improves the learned abundance model and moreover allows the learned model to predict variant effects on an interpretable scale. Our work highlights the importance of combining MAVE results with low-throughput experiments to facilitate MAVE score interpretation and supervised model training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.