ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Clinical applications and future perspectives of circulating tumor cells in solid tumors.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining Napsin A expression with circulating tumor cell counts for enhanced identification of pulmonary adenocarcinoma in ground-glass nodules.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastasis remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, despite notable advancements in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), malignant cells shed from primary or metastatic lesions into the bloodstream, have emerged as promising biomarkers with considerable potential across the cancer care continuum. Unlike disseminated tumor cells (DTCs), which reside in distant tissues and require invasive sampling, CTCs can be isolated through minimally invasive liquid biopsies, enabling real-time monitoring of disease progression, therapeutic response, and emergence of resistance. However, current CTC detection methods face limitations in sensitivity, particularly in early-stage disease where cell counts are low. Recent technological innovations, including microfluidic platforms, size-based filtration, and nanotechnology-enhanced assays, aim to improve both sensitivity and specificity, allowing for deeper molecular characterization. Beyond enumeration, CTCs offer insight into tumor heterogeneity, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and resistance mechanisms, and may hold predictive value in therapy selection. While CTC phenotyping and genotyping have shown prognostic significance in various solid tumors, standardized clinical protocols for integrating CTC analysis into treatment decision-making remain under development. Future research is focused on elucidating the functional biology of CTCs, including their role in metastasis and tumor dormancy. Additionally, CTC-based biomarkers could guide precision oncology strategies, allowing for patient-specific therapies and longitudinal surveillance. As detection platforms mature and clinical validation progresses, CTCs are poised to become integral tools in personalized cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.