ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Bridging practices prior to brexucabtagene autoleucel for mantle cell lymphoma in the United Kingdom: An analysis of modality, response, toxicity and survival.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response alone does not define optimal bridging before brexucabtagene autoleucel in mantle cell lymphoma.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Author response to Zhang and Chen.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma in asia: redefining the role of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bridging therapy (BT) prior to brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is supported by limited evidence. Here, we report BT modality and outcome in 176 patients at 15 centres in the United Kingdom. BT was delivered to 90% (158/176), the majority receiving standard chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy (53%) (SD chemo +/- RT) or targeted therapy (TT) alone (23%). Clinicians favoured SD chemo +/- RT in those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 1, blastoid disease, bulk >5 cm and elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Overall response rate (ORR) was 46%. Higher ORR was observed with SD chemo +/- RT (58%), particularly R-BAC (64%). Progressive disease despite BT was associated with a lower ORR to brexu-cel (77% vs. 91%, p = 0.03) and a higher risk of ≥grade 3 ICANS (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.44-8.10, p = 0.01). SD chemo +/- RT was associated with a higher incidence of ≥grade 3 neutropenia (Month 1), ≥grade 3 thrombocytopenia (Month 1, Month 3) and early non-relapse mortality (<90 days, 13% vs. 0%) compared to TT alone. Neither BT modality nor response impacted progression-free or overall survival post-infusion. Review of haematopoietic reserve prior to the selection of BT regimen, rigorous management of delayed cytopenia post-infusion and more effective and tolerable BT should be prioritised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.