ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning framework for multidimensional assessment of urban quality of life.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study uses statistical and machine learning techniques to categorize and rank 99 high development cities according to multidimensional Quality of Life factors (QoL). We categorize cities into three unique clusters using hierarchical Ward.D2 clustering and Principal Component Analysis for dimension reduction. We discover clusters that bring together economically developed cities with strong social safety nets, high-income cities lacking in public amenities, rising cities of the future located in peripheral regions, and major population centers in the developing world, finding considerable structural similarities that lead to comparable outcomes across culturally and geographically diverse cities. Components of QoL are grouped into three Principal Components that reveal dynamic interactions between different variables influencing economic and experimental aspects of QoL. Clusters are assessed relative to one another using the three PCs, and crucial factors for classifying cities into different clusters are identified by a Decision tree to allow for tailored policy recommendations for cities of different clusters. Our findings give policymakers a framework to prioritize holistic urban development over GDP-centric models, highlighting the importance of striking a balance between objective standards of human development and subjective, experiential indicators of individual wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.