Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41796995›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026

Comparative outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with stage III endometrial cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Khemanat Khemworapong, Janjira Petsuksiri, Atthapon Jaishuen, Pittaya Dankulchai, Kullathorn Thephamongkol, Jiraporn Setakornnukul

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Khemanat KhemworapongDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-0909
Janjira PetsuksiriDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. janjira.pet@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-4899
Atthapon JaishuenDivision of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7618-4609
Pittaya DankulchaiDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1150-1399
Kullathorn ThephamongkolDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0998-8874
Jiraporn SetakornnukulDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-0377

Funding

The Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone vs. adjuvant CT combined with radiation therapy (CRT) in patients with stage III endometrial cancer. All patients received 6 cycles of CT before radiation therapy (RT) were initiated. We also explored specific patient subgroups that might benefit from the addition of RT.

methodsBetween 2007 and 2019, we analyzed 118 patients after propensity score matching, with 59 patients in each group (CT alone vs. CRT). The primary endpoint was pelvic recurrence; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS). We conducted exploratory subgroup analyses stratifying patients by stage, histological grade, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and cervical involvement to assess whether these factors influenced outcomes between the 2 treatments.

resultsPatients receiving CRT had significantly lower 5-year pelvic recurrence rates than those receiving CT alone (1.8% vs. 17.9%; hazard ratio [HR]=0.09 [0.01-0.71]; p=0.004). There was no significant difference in 5-year PFS between the 2 groups overall (67.6% vs. 72.3%; HR=0.75 [0.39-1.46]; p=0.393). However, in high-risk

conclusionCompared with CT alone, CRT improved pelvic control overall and significantly improved pelvic control and PFS in high-risk

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedChemotherapyEndometrial CancerRadiation Therapy

Identifiers

PMID41796995
PMCPMC13365732

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.