ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Thinking Critically About Algorithms for Automated Detection of Behavior: 11 Guidelines for Social and Behavioral Scientists.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body position classification using wearable sensors in infants with cerebral palsy.Infant behavior & development · 2026Article
- Decoding Preschool Social Dynamics: Automated Tracking of Spatial and Temporal Patterns to Investigate Social Interactions and Relationships in Peer Groups.Developmental science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental psychologists are increasingly leveraging mobile and wearable sensors paired with machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically detect the everyday behaviors and interactions theorized to drive development. These technologies provide an opportunity to capture learners' real-world experiences, with wide-ranging implications for basic science and intervention. However, many developmentalists lack the training to critically evaluate the accuracy of models used to automatically detect behavior and may not be aware of various challenges of implementing these approaches in real-world settings. To advance the next wave of research and innovation in this area, we provide readers with a set of 11 practical guidelines that will give researchers the critical perspective necessary to leverage or codesign systems in a way that is technically sound, ethically responsive, and practical. Our guidelines highlight common pitfalls and challenges with using AI for research and intervention, matched with best practices and practical recommendations for researchers working in this field. They cover the limits of model generalizability, recommendations for careful interpretation of accuracy statistics, the importance of real-world feasibility, ethical deployment, and interdisciplinary collaboration with sustained community engagement. Collectively, these guidelines provide a foundation for advancing the rigor, equity, and impact of tools for activity recognition in developmental science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.