ArticleNursing open2026
Development, Validation and Primary Application of a Competency-Based Training Course Index System for Gynaecological Specialist Nurses in China: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to establish an indexing system for training courses based on post-competency for gynaecological specialist nurses.
designA mixed-methods study.
methodsWe employed literature reviews and semi-structured interviews to develop a preliminary index system. Subsequently, a two-round Delphi consultation survey was conducted to get insights from 15 experts regarding the index for evaluating the post-competency of gynaecological specialist nurses and to obtain qualitative feedback on their assessments. Following the finalisation of the competency index system, a 3-month training programme was implemented with 75 specialist nurses to evaluate its practical application. These nurses completed the training and returned to their clinical duties after successfully passing the competency evaluation.
resultsThe comprehensive training course index system for post-competency gynaecological specialist nurses comprises four primary indices: gynaecological-specialised theoretical knowledge, gynaecological-specialised practical skills, communication and coordination management skills and clinical thinking and research management skills. This system further includes 12 secondary indexes and 58 tertiary indexes. The response rates for the two expert consultation rounds were 100%. The expert authority coefficients were 0.943 and 0.942 in the initial and subsequent rounds of consultation, respectively. During the second round of consultation, the initial and subsequent indices of Kendall's coefficient of concordance were 0.210 and 0.257, respectively (p < 0.05). Seventy-five specialist nurses in gynaecology completed 4 weeks of theoretical education and 8 weeks of practical training. The mean score of gynaecological specialist nurses on the theoretical examination increased from 65.4 before training to 91.2 after training (p < 0.001); the mean score on the self-assessment of post-competency rose from 39.5 prior to training to 86.8 subsequent to training (p < 0.001); the comparison of pre-training and post-training results was statistically significant.
conclusionsThe index system for the training course of gynaecological specialist nurses was designed in a logical and thorough manner, and the findings from its empirical study provided a foundation for the formation of a scientific and systematic gynaecology specialist nursing team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.