ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Clinician Satisfaction With Pharmacogenomics Clinical Services at a Multistate Health System.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) utilizes genetic information to optimize medication management. Barriers to PGx implementation include limited confidence and knowledge in applying results, time constraints, and financial barriers. Clinical services across health systems vary greatly with differing consultative PGx service models. Most research on clinicians and PGx has been centered around attitudes and perspectives, with limited data regarding clinician satisfaction with PGx clinical services. An internally developed survey was created to assess clinician satisfaction with PGx services across a single health system. A survey was deployed to 645 clinicians (physicians, advanced practice providers, and genetic counselors) who utilized PGx clinical services (ordered PGx testing or a referral to the PGx clinic) within the past 3 years. Surveys were distributed via secure email in June 2025. A total of 36 out of 645 clinicians participated in the survey, which is noted as a limitation. Respondents tended to be satisfied ("somewhat satisfied" or "very satisfied") across several clinical service domains (e.g., process of ordering PGx testing, integration into the electronic health record, and return of PGx results). Pharmacist notes and clinical decision support yielded the highest satisfaction. Most clinicians reported PGx results have positively impacted patient outcomes. Nearly half of respondents noted experiencing barriers in explaining PGx results to patients. The PGx clinic may help mitigate barriers in explaining PGx results to patients. Overall, responding clinicians were satisfied with the majority of PGx clinical services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.