Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Validation of the sibling acceptance questionnaire among typically-developing emerging adult siblings of individuals with disabilities.

Raaya Alon, Or Catz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raaya AlonDepartment of Special Education, Michlalah Jerusalem College, Jerusalem, Israel.
Or CatzDepartment of Psychology, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sibling acceptance is a central component of sibling relationships, including when one sibling has a developmental disability, shaping the quality, stability, and long-term functioning of the family. Despite its importance, sibling acceptance has received little systematic quantitative attention, and validated measures remain scarce. This study validated the Sibling Acceptance Questionnaire among typically-developing emerging adult siblings of individuals with developmental disabilities. The original instrument, developed by Brenner to assess parental acceptance, was adapted for siblings but had not undergone rigorous psychometric evaluation. To do so, data were collected from 854 siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or Down syndrome. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor structure: perceived burden and limitation, openness to sharing, and perceptions of parental attention. Internal consistency across factors indicated reliable measurement. Content validity was further supported by significant associations between functional independence and both burden/limitation and openness to sharing, but not parental attention. By establishing the reliability and validity of this instrument, the study addresses a methodological gap and provides researchers and practitioners with a valuable tool for advancing research and interventions that promote sibling relationships, family functioning, and the well being of siblings with and without disabilities.

Indexed as

developmental disabilitiesfactor analysispsychometric validationsibling acceptancetypically-developing siblings

Identifiers

PMID41798035
PMCPMC12962889

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.