Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798118›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026

Preserved IDH mutation and methylation class in vorasidenib nonresponders: A report of 2 cases.

Mehdi Touat, Jacqueline Lehmann-Che, Salah Eddine O Kacimi, Besma Barka, Homa Adle-Biassette, Chiara Villa, Brigitte Poirot, Sébastien Froelich, Franck Bielle, Emmanuel Mandonnet

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mehdi TouatDepartment of Neuro-oncology, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix Hospital Group, AP-HP Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-7799
Jacqueline Lehmann-CheMolecular Biology Department, Saint-Louis hospital, Paris, France.
Salah Eddine O KacimiParis Brain Institute, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM U1127, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Besma BarkaDepartment of Neuropathology, AP-HP Sorbonne University, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix Hospital Group, Paris, France.
Homa Adle-BiassetteNeuropathology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Chiara VillaNeuropathology Department, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Brigitte PoirotMolecular Biology Department, Saint-Louis hospital, Paris, France.
Sébastien FroelichExperimental Neurosurgery Laboratory, Lariboisière Hospital, reConnect IHU, Paris, France.
Franck BielleDepartment of Neuropathology, AP-HP Sorbonne University, La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix Hospital Group, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-6388
Emmanuel MandonnetFrontlab, Paris Brain Institute, CNRS UMR 7225, INSERM U1127, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The INDIGO trial recently showed that vorasidenib improves progression-free survival in patients with grade 2 IDH-mutated glioma. However, 20%-25% of patients experienced disease progression within the first year, referred to here as nonresponders. This finding raises the question of whether such resistance may be linked to the selection of an IDH-wildtype clone, potentially decreasing subsequent response to conventional treatments. Case Summary: We present 2 patients in whom postoperative administration of vorasidenib following initial resection failed to prevent the progression of residual tumor. After vorasidenib discontinuation, both patients were successfully managed with a combination of conventional treatments, including new surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Molecular analysis confirmed the preservation of the IDH mutation, MGMT status, and methylation class in the recurrent tumor in both cases. At the last follow-up, 3 years after vorasidenib discontinuation, the disease remained stable in 1 patient, while the other one had recurred. Conclusions: Vorasidenib does not appear to select an IDH-wildtype clone that would potentially reduce the tumor's sensitivity to standard therapies typically used in IDH-mutated glioma.

Indexed as

diffuse low-grade gliomaIDH mutationmethylomeresistancevorasidenib

Identifiers

PMID41798118
PMCPMC12965650

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.