ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026
Preserved IDH mutation and methylation class in vorasidenib nonresponders: A report of 2 cases.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing radiological response of IDH-mutated glioma to vorasidenib by tumor diameter slopes: a series of 8 cases.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The INDIGO trial recently showed that vorasidenib improves progression-free survival in patients with grade 2 IDH-mutated glioma. However, 20%-25% of patients experienced disease progression within the first year, referred to here as nonresponders. This finding raises the question of whether such resistance may be linked to the selection of an IDH-wildtype clone, potentially decreasing subsequent response to conventional treatments. Case Summary: We present 2 patients in whom postoperative administration of vorasidenib following initial resection failed to prevent the progression of residual tumor. After vorasidenib discontinuation, both patients were successfully managed with a combination of conventional treatments, including new surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Molecular analysis confirmed the preservation of the IDH mutation, MGMT status, and methylation class in the recurrent tumor in both cases. At the last follow-up, 3 years after vorasidenib discontinuation, the disease remained stable in 1 patient, while the other one had recurred. Conclusions: Vorasidenib does not appear to select an IDH-wildtype clone that would potentially reduce the tumor's sensitivity to standard therapies typically used in IDH-mutated glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.