ReviewCureus2026
Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Women With Overt Diabetes at Diagnosis Versus Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Women diagnosed with hyperglycemia in pregnancy represent a heterogeneous population. A distinct subgroup, those with overt diabetes or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) diagnosed at the first prenatal visit or during pregnancy (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%), may carry a significantly higher long-term cardiometabolic risk than women with standard gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to review and meta-analyse the risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and cardiovascular risk markers in women diagnosed with overt diabetes during pregnancy compared to those with GDM. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Observational studies comparing maternal postpartum cardiometabolic outcomes between women with overt diabetes (excluding known pre-existing diabetes) and women with GDM were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI checklists. Random-effects meta-analysis with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment was performed. The primary outcome was incident postpartum T2DM. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Seven studies (n = 3,293 participants) from Asia, Africa, Oceania, and Europe met the inclusion criteria. Women with overt diabetes had a substantially increased risk of developing postpartum T2DM compared to women with GDM (pooled odds ratio (OR) 10.69; 95% CI 5.32-21.48;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.