Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798582›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Diagnostic Modalities in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.

Sara Tariq, Arshia Ahmed, Gurdeep Singh, Paul Dura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara TariqInternal Medicine, Guthrie Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton, USA.
Arshia AhmedInternal Medicine, Guthrie Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton, USA.
Gurdeep SinghEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Guthrie Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton, USA.
Paul DuraRheumatology, Guthrie Lourdes Hospital, Binghamton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune condition affecting the joints and other organs such as the heart, eyes, and lungs. For decades, it has been diagnosed through assessing a combination of clinical picture, serologic biomarkers, and radiographic studies. However, the possibility of false negative test results and inability to detect early arthritic changes make RA diagnosis challenging. The diagnostic accuracy of the RA diagnostic modalities has substantially improved since the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical algorithms, resulting in timely disease prediction and prevention of irreversible joint damage. AI computational models employ machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and rule-based expert systems to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of rheumatological diseases, particularly rheumatoid arthritis. AI-based algorithms not only identify specific disease patterns to predict the early course of disease but also use visual scoring systems, enhancing imaging characteristics. Radiological studies such as X-ray, MRI, CT, and PET scan can quantify joint space narrowing, cartilage loss, synovitis, bone erosions, and bone marrow edema. In addition, ML-integrated microRNA gene profiling reshaped the microenvironment of joint space by modulating gene expression and reducing joint deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis patients, surpassing the rheumatoid factor (RF) and cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) risk scoring models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnostic modalitiesmachine learning modelsnatural language processing modelsrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID41798582
PMCPMC12965850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.