Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798639›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026

Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary Leak.

Bin Li, Ling Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bin LiDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-2548-4800
Ling ZhaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The People's Hospital Medical Group of Xiangzhou, Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6822-8632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and the resultant capillary leak syndrome are defining features of septic shock, posing a profound challenge to conventional fluid resuscitation strategies. The long-standing debate over crystalloid versus colloid administration is evolving beyond a simple dichotomy toward a more nuanced, physiologically informed approach. This review critically examines the pathophysiological cascade driving vascular hyperpermeability in sepsis-from endothelial glycocalyx degradation and inflammatory cytokine storms to oxidative stress and nitric oxide dysregulation. We trace the evolution of resuscitation paradigms from early goal-directed therapy to modern conservative approaches, highlighting the limitations of crystalloid-dominant protocols, including intravascular volume depletion despite a positive fluid balance and iatrogenic organ injury. Drawing on evidence from landmark clinical trials (eg, ALBIOS, CRISTAL, SMART) and a pharmacological reappraisal of fluid properties, we argue that a one-size-fits-all strategy is obsolete. Instead, this narrative review synthesizes recent trial evidence and pathophysiological insights to propose the Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing (PAES) resuscitation strategy, a novel framework that tailors fluid type and volume to the distinct temporal phases of septic shock: Rescue, Optimization, Stabilization, and De-escalation. This model advocates for initial resuscitation with balanced crystalloids, followed by the judicious integration of albumin in specific, high-risk patient subgroups to leverage its unique oncotic and pleiotropic, endothelium-stabilizing effects. We further outline how dynamic hemodynamic monitoring, point-of-care ultrasound, and emerging biomarkers of endothelial injury (eg, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2) can guide the real-time implementation of this personalized strategy. The PAES framework aims to uncouple macrohemodynamic stabilization from microcirculatory injury, offering a pragmatic pathway to optimize perfusion, mitigate capillary leak, and improve outcomes in this critically ill population.

Indexed as

capillary leak syndromeendothelial dysfunctionfluid resuscitationpersonalized medicineseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID41798639
PMCPMC12967089

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.