Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798696›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Assessment of autonomic function in patient with COVID-19 and other infectious diseases using a wearable smart band connected to a mobile application.

Eun Bit Bae, Jang Wook Sohn, Jeong Yeon Kim, Kyu-Man Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eun Bit BaeKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Jang Wook SohnKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Yeon KimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Man HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The negative impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on mental health, including that of movement restrictions that unintentionally contributed to its deterioration, has been widely reported. However, the effects of isolation and related factors remain unclear. To explore the physiological, psychological, and lifestyle factors that affected stress levels in individuals with confirmed COVID-19 undergoing isolation, we used a modified version of a commercially available wearable device for the purpose of real-time monitoring. The study included 60 infection patients affected by infectious diseases (30 with confirmed COVID-19 undergoing isolation at home, and 30 inpatients at our institution with other infectious diseases). Based on the data distribution, we conducted correlation analyses within each group and evaluated the relationship between variables using conservative methods, general linear regression, and linear mixed models. The groups comparison was evaluated using an independent-samples t-test. Stress scores in the study population showed significant associations with psychological and lifestyle factors, but not with psychiatric scale scores. According to the linear model, caffeine consumption affected the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) (p = 0.031). In participants with confirmed COVID-19 undergoing isolation at home, alcohol consumption and anxiety levels showed strong correlations with RMSSD (p< 0.005), although this was not evident in linear models. Stress scores were significantly higher in participants with COVID-19, whereas RMSSD deviation from the mean of an age-matched Korean cohort was significantly lower than that in patients with other infectious diseases. This study suggests that while perceived stress may influence parasympathetic function in all patients with infectious diseases, this effect may be particularly pronounced in those with COVID-19 undergoing isolation. These individuals are more likely to experience stress and anxiety, and their parasympathetic function may be compromised (reflected in a reduction of heart rate variability). Our results suggests that lifestyle factors and perceived stress influences parasympathetic function in under stressful conditions associated with confinement, and that these factors should be considered in the management of individuals with COVID-19 in isolation.

Indexed as

coronavirus disease (COVID)-19heart rate variability (HRV)isolationmonitoringpost-pandemicsmart bandstresswearable device

Identifiers

PMID41798696
PMCPMC12960646

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.